Athlon vs Pentium III
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Hoyt Eric.Hoyt at colorado.eduFri Feb 16 15:04:10 PST 2001
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I'm in the initial phase of putting together a 24 node cluster. The specifics of what it will be used for aren't fully developed (ie what applications will be run), but its main purpose will be optical simulations. One issue I am faced with is the choice in CPU. I know the response to "What hardware should I choose?" is always application specific, so I'm just looking for general pointers and any issues people may have encountered that they would be willing to share. Anyway, here is what it has been narrowed down to: I can put together a cluster of 24 Thunderbird 850s, or 12 dual PIIIs at 1GHz (24 total CPUs) for around the same amount. Both setups have 256MB of memory per CPU. What do you consider when making a decision like this? What scenarios favor Athlons, and what scenarios favor PIIIs? Also, I have heard advice to go with classic Athlons instead of Thunderbirds, due to 512k off die vs 256k on die cache issues. Again, what would make you lean one way or the other? Again, I know that the ultimate decision will depend on what we'll be running, but any general tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Eric Hoyt
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: Athlon vs Pentium III
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
