memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jag agrajag at linuxpower.orgFri Feb 16 12:42:44 PST 2001
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dan Smith wrote: > > Hello, > > I recently installed Scyld Beowulf on our cluster. It works fine, but when > I use BeoStatus to look at the slaves it shows that the slaves all have > about 400MB of their memory taken up. Anyone know what is eating up the RAM > on those slaves? Each node has a total of 512MB of RAM. Why is beowulf > eating up so much of it? Thanks. The number that beostatus uses for the amount of memory used includes the memory used by programs as well as the memory used by the kernel for buffers and such. This is the same as the program 'free'. If you ever run 'free' you'll ntoice that the amount of memory used seems kinda high, this is because it takes into account kernel buffers and cache. Jag -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20010216/bc62a5d3/attachment.bin
- Previous message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Next message: memory usage on Scyld slave nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
