Scyld and Red Hat 7

[Eugene.Leitl at lrz.uni-muenchen.de]

kragen at pobox.com wrote:
 
> IMHO, this is not a particularly good explanation of the situation;
> metadata-journaling filesystems like ReiserFS sacrifice a little
> performance in the average case (when everything is working fine) to
> make fscking after a crash very quick.

I have the impression ReiserFS also offers much better performance
and noticeably better raw bit utilization in case of many small files.
Also, the roadmap is at where the goodies are. It is not just a fs...

For a good time call:
	http://www.namesys.com/