diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David van der Spoel spoel at xray.bmc.uu.seFri Dec 7 04:10:19 PST 2001
- Previous message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Velocet wrote: >well. I need someone to point out to me where my reasons are just dead wrong, >or where I dont have enough experience - perhaps they can anticipate where I >will go wrong before I find out the hard way. However, so far, others have >raised points that I've indicated dont necessarily indicate that a diskless >system is a bad choice all round (admittedly I havent gotten through >all of today's posts yet). As always YMMV. But quantum chemistry is an application in which the disk access can be crucial. I've seen differences in total run time for a job of a factor 3 between a disk accesed thru DMA and Non-DMA. If you have to do all scratch space over NFS you will even have lower performance. Groeten, David. ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. David van der Spoel, Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755 spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- Previous message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Next message: diskless nodes? (was Re: Xbox clusters?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
