distributed file systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Tegner tegner at nada.kth.seFri Aug 31 05:20:40 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Scyld Booting Problem
- Next message: distributed file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We have a small cluster consisting of nine nodes, and we are currently exporting /home from the master to every node using nfs. We have also tried using pvfs, using partitions from all nodes in one "parallel partition"- something which was slower than only using nfs (since we don't have access to the source of the codes we use, we cannot write in parallel). Maybe it would be better to only use two nodes for every parallel partition, i.e., n1 and n2 builds home1, n3 and n4 builds home2 ... ? Haven't tried, but it seems that afs should be slightly faster than nfs, see http://www.ait.iastate.edu/olc/storage/afs/nfs2afs.txt.html My question now is if you have any suggestion of a "best method" for a distributed file system to use in a cluster environment. Regards, Jon Tegner
- Previous message: Scyld Booting Problem
- Next message: distributed file systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
