Switch to avoid (was Re: NIC to avoid...?)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural (exa) erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.trTue Aug 28 18:38:31 PDT 2001
- Previous message: NIC to avoid...?
- Next message: Switch to avoid (was Re: NIC to avoid...?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Make sure your NIC and your switch talk the same language. Today's switches aren't optimized for beowulf interconnection network, they have been designed for common use by many people. We're pretty glad with our 3com switch, but it'd be better to know what's inside that box. That Cisco hardware may be good under that load, but supercomputing is something else. Unfortunately, you can't trust your senses so the best way is to see which switches are preferred in other Beowulf systems. That's why we used 3com, there have been many successful systems using 3com and it was cheaper than Cisco. - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7jEeZfAeuFodNU5wRAr3eAJ4rSQ9Lgag15avpej7O3YTQyLNNIwCfaqNl wFOfzkYrd15EkGLUsillE2g= =jDXc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: NIC to avoid...?
- Next message: Switch to avoid (was Re: NIC to avoid...?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
