Memory type? (ECC vs non-ECC) - memory testing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Thomas R Boehme mail at thomas-boehme.deFri Aug 17 16:13:03 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Memory type? (ECC vs non-ECC) - memory testing
- Next message: Memory type? (ECC vs non-ECC) - memory testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> i think that the scope of the question for "how certain you are of the > results of the computation" is beyond the scope of memory and should also > include cpu, disks, io, motherboard, cables, programs, etc..etc.. > That is correct. Like I said, our problems were heat related and not a memory problem. > -- when was the last time you had a memory failure compared to > other things that needed fixing... > - power cable, programming bugs, disk cabling, etc..etc.. > Well I don't know - without ECC I have no way of telling when I had the last memory failure. And with all the bad cheap memory chips out there, I would prefer knowing it. That's why ECC makes sense. Sure, it is not the only source. And I do agree that programming bugs are probably the biggest problem that can't really be fixed. I know my codes have numerous bugs -- I just don't know where :-) Bye, Thommy
- Previous message: Memory type? (ECC vs non-ECC) - memory testing
- Next message: Memory type? (ECC vs non-ECC) - memory testing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
