Sun Sparc performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Marc Cozzi cozzi at hertz.rad.nd.eduSat Aug 4 05:33:37 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Sun Sparc performance
- Next message: another problem! MPICH
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sure, you can cluster SUN systems as easily as IA32 based systems. However because of the cost of SPARC based systems I don't think they qualify as "commodity" based systems so it may not be fair to call it Beowulf clustering. Additionally, with SUN systems anyway, I use Myrinet high speed low latency components. The cost of these devices are not exactly commodity either. As for the performance, I swear I'm going to get a T-shirt that says "It depends on the application". Compilers, 64bit vs 32bit, cache, etc. marc -----Original Message----- From: clpoh [mailto:clpoh at pl.jaring.my] Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 3:35 AM To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: Sun Sparc performance Has anybody tried Beouwlf clustering on Sun Ultra SPARC machines ? I did a benchmark on 3 sets of Sun Ultra SPARC machines using POVRAY but the result I got is even slower than my other cluster with AMD K6-2. iS THIS OK ? Regards, Poh Chean Leng _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Sun Sparc performance
- Next message: another problem! MPICH
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
