IBM goes grid
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comThu Aug 2 09:14:46 PDT 2001
- Previous message: IBM goes grid
- Next message: IBM goes grid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:17:54AM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > It is interesting to think about how one would make a beowulf (in the > softer definition of a named cluster, not necessarily constrained to but > definitely including the strict/scyld/dedicated sense) a member of a > distributed "super" cluster with existing tools and minimal work. Even > doing it inside our own department is going to be challenging. > > Seems like a useful project for some grad students in CS departments > that concentrate on cluster computing, e.g. Clemson. Walt? Anybody? Legion, Globus, and Condor all did this ages ago, and others too. What do you think that's new that can be done? g
- Previous message: IBM goes grid
- Next message: IBM goes grid
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list