Why no rlogin to nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Northrup nodezero at pacbell.netSat Oct 14 17:47:24 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Next message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeff, Thank-you for the report from Atlanta sir! I like the reasoning behind Scyld releases, I do not have the time to get my hands dirty with allot of the code, in fact I couldn't if I wanted too! I am really looking forward to a wulf with a lower TCO and ease.. Disks are in the mail! Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Layton" <laytonjb at mindspring.com> To: <beowulf at beowulf.org> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 3:51 PM Subject: Re: Why no rlogin to nodes? > At 03:20 PM 10/12/00 -0400, you wrote: > > > >Walt, > > > ><shameless> > >Run Scyld Beowulf! Our nodes don't even have inetd -- let alone > >rsh, telnet, or ftp daemons! > ></shameless> > > Well, I just saw the demo of the Scyld stuff at > Atlanta Linux Showcase today (at 3:00). It is fantastic! > I can't even begin to describe what this does for clustering. > No inetd, not telnet, etc. I think this solves some > security concerns about cracking the compute nodes > (unless you crack the master node first, but then > again, there's really nothing on the compute nodes > anyway and Beowulf2 can wipe the disk on reboot so > any cracked files are gone). > > I think there are a couple of pieces left before it > fulfills my production requirements, but it's darn > close. > > If you get a chance to test this distribution, do it! > You won't regret it. > > Jeff > > > > > >Cheers, > > Dan Ridge > > Scyld Computing Corporation > > > >> I never disabled rlogin (or ftp ot telnet for that matter) on the > >> nodes of my cluster. Now I have a user who is rlogin-ing to > >> nodes, then rlogin-ing from there to yet other nodes. Is there > >> a reason someone would want to do this? Better question, > >> Is there good justification I can use to now shut off services, > >> like rlogin, that have been left on previously? I'll need a good > >> reason I'm afraid... > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Beowulf mailing list > >Beowulf at beowulf.org > >http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list > Beowulf at beowulf.org > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Next message: Why no rlogin to nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
