3x100Mbps: summary
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
beowulf at seinfeld.engr.ucf.edu beowulf at seinfeld.engr.ucf.eduThu Oct 12 09:47:25 PDT 2000
- Previous message: 3x100Mbps: summary
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments. 10/7, 10:43
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Douglas Eadline wrote: > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 beowulf at seinfeld.engr.ucf.edu wrote: > > > --snip-- > > > > We have 16 compute nodes and one server/frontend. > > > > Our setup is: > > Motherboard: SuperMicro P6DGE Intel BX > > Processor(s): Dual PII-350 > > Memory: 256MB PC100 > > HardDrive: FUJITSU 8GB > > Ethernet: 3 x Kingston KNE100TX (tulip) > > OS: RedHat 6.1 > > Kernel: 2.2.17 > > > > Does anyone know why the 3 channel network would perform worse then the 2 > > channel network? The only real differences between our setups is that we > > use SMP nodes, but you have faster processors. I know that running in SMP > > under linux causes the network latency to increase, but could it be the > > cause of our 3 channel network problems? > > The one thing you did not report was your switch setup. > This can have an effect. Sorry about that. We have 3 Linksys DSSX24 24 port switchs. I was thinking that since we have seperate switchs for each channel and that 2 channels work great, 3 channels should not be any different when considering the switches. Judd Tracy jtr at isl.engr.ucf.edu
- Previous message: 3x100Mbps: summary
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments. 10/7, 10:43
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
