Why not NT clusters? Need arguments.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jon Tegner tegner at nada.kth.seFri Oct 6 07:04:45 PDT 2000
- Previous message: Announce: LECCIBG
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In a disussion of clusters I got the question why not using systems running microsoft NT. I only came up with cost and stability in a sweeping way, and I couldnt present more quantitative arguments. Later, I even found that an nt cluster sits on place 207 on the top500 list (see http://www.top500.org/lists/TOP500List.php3?Y=2000&M=06) is that an exception, or are there many of these beasts around? I would appreciate to be enlightened on this issue. Thanks, /jon
- Previous message: Announce: LECCIBG
- Next message: Why not NT clusters? Need arguments.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list